I am almost halfway through “The Moon is a Harsh Mistress” by Robert A. Heinlein and I am enjoying it a lot. This is one of his most famous titles, telling a story of a late XXI-century guerrilla movement. The organization was created and operates on the Moon which in the book is a penal colony with millions of inhabitants, including not only convicts but also free immigrants and people born there.
Heinlein portrays a slightly anarchistic society that runs itself and trades its products with Earth like a regular state. There are almost no prison guards and the ones that are present serve mostly as bodyguards to high level representatives of the Authority – the administrative body set up by Earth. The Authority does not involve itself in running most of the matters of the colony. It does, however, hold monopoly on exports as it owns the only lunar “catapult” – a huge construction able to transport goods towards Earth. Apart from that, it dictates prices on substantial goods and products like water or fertilizers and controls many aspects of internal trade.
“Loonies”, as the colonists call themselves, despise the Earth-imposed overseers as many of them believe their society could attain much higher level of development without such heavy-handed approach. Unfortunately, they lack any kind of national identity related to the Moon and all previous attempts at liberation proved inefficient or even suicidal. Nonetheless, things start to change when one of the illegal rebel meetings is attended by Manuel Garcia “Mannie” O’Kelly-Davis, the book’s protagonist and narrator. Mannie is a freelance computer technician who is regularly tasked with maintenance and repairs of the Authority’s master supercomputer – HOLMES-IV, central to the functioning of the colony on every level, from infrastructure management to payroll of civil servants.
It is sufficient to say that some time before the meeting the computer became self-aware and started developing human features. Mannie is the only person who knows this and also the only friend of Mike’s (as they both call HOLMES-IV). Due to some disturbing events the two get involved in the rebellion with Mike becoming the Chairman. Yes, this truly is a story about an AI-supported revolution and, after reading Heinlein’s descriptions and explanations, it does not seem that ridiculous for a science-fiction novel. What is more, even as it was first published in 1965, it does not feel too outdated in terms of the state of technology described in it. It is believable, despite Loonies using telephones instead of some kind of lunar Internet and the lack of LCD displays, iPods and similar gadgets Heinlein did not predict.
The only thing I find strange is that up to this point almost no casualties have been suffered by the revolutionaries. Some risks, including really big ones, are taken, complex plots are put in motion but everything works out well. Too well, in fact – it is almost like in rebel’s utopia. Knowing that this state of affairs cannot last forever (Heinlein was a great writer and this is not a naive tale) I am already developing anxiety about what is going to happen to characters I have started to identify with. I guess this is a proof of how good the book is.
I will write more about the book once I finish reading it.
Please note that comments are numbered with unique ID numbers that allow to identify them accross the whole web site instead of just one article.
[...] suffered. Lunar society turned out to be not just “slightly anarchistic” as I have claimed before but rather libertarian to the full meaning of this term, with no official state-like [...]